|
Background:
1. Since its inception in 2002, Research Initiatives Bangladesh
(RIB) has focused upon education as a key sector of its research
support programme on poverty alleviation. One of the first
research projects it funded was on education of children belonging
to the most economically depressed sections of society, particularly
in hard to reach rural areas of the country. Somehow these
children have remained "missing" from the country's
free primary education system, despite many years' of efforts
by government and non-government agencies. The basic objective
of the research is to devise an approach to bring them in.
Specific Objectives:
2. The research project was undertaken by a group of young
college teachers in a village in southwestern Bangladesh named
Kajoli, in the Sripur Upozila of Magura District. The main
goal of the project, which emerged from discussions between
the researchers, members of RIB's Board of Directors and experts
in the field, was to develop a model for community-run Early
Childhood Education Center (ECEC) that would make the above-mentioned
"missing children" education-minded and pave the
way for their entry into mainstream education. As the researchers
were young and inexperienced, it was also decided that RIB
would provide them with guidance, whenever necessary. The
project was formally launched on 1 January 2003. The specific
objectives of the research were jointly set to be as follows:
- The research work will follow the Participatory Action
Research (PAR) methodology and would have two distinct but
interlinked aspects of equal importance. One focusing upon
social aspects of setting up and sustaining ECECs in the
village and the other on methodological and curriculum-related
aspects of imparting knowledge.
- The social aspects should consider replication and sustainability
as key elements. The model must be implementable through
community support alone. In other words, it should be able
to operate without outside support, whether from the government
or elsewhere.
- To ensure sustainability, specific focus must be given
on participation by all sections of the village community
in the affairs of the ECEC, including parents, local primary
school teachers, and the village population at large.
- The model should be specifically focused upon children
from families with no tradition of education, where parents
are illiterate and the children are otherwise unlikely to
go to school.
- Children between 4 and 5 years of age should be the focus
of the approach so that after a year's stay at the Center
they would emerge with a desire to continue education at
normal schools. The ECECs should be designed to serve as
a bridge to government primary school where the age of entry
is fixed at 6.
- The curriculum of activities at the Center should be based
on the principle of learning as a "fun and game"
affair and not a difficult, boring and tiresome exercise,
as is often the perception of many parents and children.
- Particular attention should be given to minimize the cost
of setting up and maintaining an ECEC on a "no cost
or low cost" basis. This is of primary importance for
sustainability. Thus the use of books, exercise books, writing
papers, pens, pencils, costly learning instruments and the
like should be eliminated.
- The focus should be on comprehensive education of the
child and not simply on cognitive knowledge aimed primarily
at the "3Rs", i.e., reading, writing and arithmetic
skills, as is often the case in the normal schooling system.
In other words, the curriculum at the Center would cater
to the whole gamut of cognitive, social, emotional and physical
development of the child. The goal is that at the end of
the stay of the child at the Center, strong foundations
would have been laid for balanced mental, physical, social,
sensory and personality growth of the child. She/he will
emerge with self-confidence, social awareness, social values,
a spirit of tolerance and respect for others, sensitivity
to others' needs, sense of cleanliness and hygiene etc.
All these should be achieved through active, hands-on learning,
conceptual learning, interactive teaching and cooperative
learning, value-based learning and learning through social
interaction.
- The curriculum at the Center should be such that a village
woman, without any formal training but with some basic education
(e.g., with a High School degree) and the right personality,
would be able to handle with ease. The requirement of experienced/trained
teacher is likely to make replication of this community-run
model extremely difficult because of the salary expectations
of such a person. However, a teachers' guide/manual containing
information in easily comprehensible language on child psychology,
the learning process of children, methodology for handling
the curriculum and time management in class etc. should
be developed.
Preliminary Findings:
3. As is evident from above, the research was circumscribed
by a number of specific goal-oriented objectives. The researchers
had to try them out, making necessary adjustments, as required.
However after a year of research at Kajoli with very encouraging
results, both in relation to the participatory and curriculum-related
aspects, RIB decided to spread the experiment to other parts
of the country for further testing. On basis of the combined
experience gathered at these places over a period of about
two years, the following findings may be said to have emerged:
- Community Participation: In view of the specific objectives
set for the Kajoli project, the ECE approach that has emerged
is quite distinct from normal Pre-Schools. The Kajoli approach
goes much beyond the traditional pre-school concept. A particularly
distinctive aspect is its emphasis on community participation
as a basis for sustainability. Unless the sustainability
and curriculum-related aspects are put together, the system
would not work.
- Socio-economic Background of the Children: A key element
in the Kajoli approach is the socio-economic background
of the children. It is not meant for children whose parents
can afford to send their children to government or privately
run schools. It focuses specifically on children who have
little or no chance of entering the mainstream schools of
the country. This has worked very well in all the places
where the model is being experimented. It is essential that
this focus be maintained for the system to succeed.
- The Role of the "Champions": It has been seen
that a foremost requirement in setting up an ECEC is the
role of dedicated individual(s) in the village who serve
as coordinator(s). They are called "champion(s)"
because they champion the cause of education of these children;
take the initiative and co-ordinate all the activities that
link the Center with the community. Once a Center has been
set up, it is of course possible for others to take up this
responsibility through, for example, setting up of a parent/community
body, like School Management Committees. This latter point
is important to safeguard management continuity against
the "champion" leaving/dying/getting sick/facing
personal or family crisis/getting very busy with own work
etc. But the initial role of the "champion(s)"
has been found to be indispensable for the system to work.
- · The role of parents/guardians of the children
has proven to be equally crucial. As they do not have the
necessary exposure to education and need to be motivated
about the importance of their children's education, it is
essential to incorporate them as stakeholders/co-owners
of the system In fact they are perhaps the most important
stakeholders. Their involvement is a basic pre-requisite
for the success of the system. It has been seen that they
enjoy being involved in most decision making relating to
the Center, from setting the class-hours to seating arrangement
of the children in the class (often the children seat on
the floor, upon mats made by parents from palm fronds),
teacher selection, teacher's leave arrangement, monthly
teacher/parent meetings and children's welfare generally.
The mothers are particularly most involved in these activities.
There is need for further research on why the fathers appear
to participate less in the affairs of the Center compared
to the mothers even though they seem to be equally pleased
with the progress of their children at the Centers.
- Provision of Mid-day Meals: But the most important role
of the parents that have emerged from the Kajoli experiment
relates to the provision of mid-day meals for the children.
In this regard a very innovative arrangement has evolved
in which each parent takes the responsibility of providing
a meal to all the children of the Center once a month. It
normally consists of a rice-and-lentil gruel with some vegetables
thrown in. [From time to time villages folks chip in some
additional items]. Thus by turn the parents collectively
feed the children on all class-days a month. Based on this
practice, it has also been established that the ideal class
size for a Center is 26 children, since on an average there
are 26 class days a month, thus making it easy for the parents
to maintain a once-a -month feeding schedule. It is the
parents of the Kajoli Center, who through discussions among
themselves have devised the arrangement. Their decision
was based on the calculation that if their children ate
at home they would have consumed as much food in 26 days
as they would require to feed 26 children once a month.
The provision of the mid-day meal not only helps in the
regular intake of food by the children but also instills
a sense of pride in them. On the day a child's mother cooks,
the child plays the role of the host, ensuring that all
the children have been properly served and fed. He/she does
so with great pride and enjoyment. It also reinforces a
sense of service and hospitality among the children. The
children also learn to express appreciation, since at the
end of each feeding they collectively thank the mother who
cooked for them. As for the parents, by providing the food
and partaking in other activities of the Center, they develop
a sense of ownership of the Center, which is essential for
its welfare as well as for the welfare of their children.
- The role of the village community has also proven to be
equally important. The idea is to bring together as many
members of the community as possible to support the Center,
at least morally and if possible by financial and other
means. Their role has varied from place to place. Normally
it included help in identifying/providing space for the
Center where the children may meet four hours a day for
six days a week. Experience has shown that wherever a village
community has come together in this regard, finding a locale
for the center is not a very big problem. If the community
can put themselves together to build a Center, which normally
consists of one room, it generates a great sense of ownership.
This has already happened in a number of Centers. In some
places someone provided the land space, others provided
the bamboos and the CI sheets, and the rest provided the
labour. This collective effort is the best recipe for success
of the ECEC. It has been found that situating the Center
near the village primary school is most convenient for two
reasons. It orients the children to the school to which
they are expected to go after a year's stay at the Center,
but more importantly it helps to link the teachers of the
primary school to the activities of the Center. This later
factor has played an important role in the enrolment of
the first year batch of the Kajoli ECEC in the local primary
school. The children have also unexpectedly benefited from
the scholarship provision instituted by the government to
help parents/children belonging to the most depressed section
of society. In fact almost all the children belonging to
the first batch who passed out of the Kajoli Center benefited
from TK. 100 scholarship a month. This has given an added
encouragement to the parents to send their children to the
ECEC.
- Fund Raising: The village community can also help to raise
the fund necessary to operate such a center. It has been
seen that it takes a one-time cost of around TK1000 (one
thousand Takas) to provide for the basic educational tools
of the system. These include blackboards and a pocket board.
[The use of these two tools will be discussed in paragraph
4 below]. The recurring costs include salary for one teacher
(between Tk.800 to Tk.1000 a month) and the cost of chalks
for writing on the blackboards (about Tk.20 a month). Thus
altogether it would cost around Tk.13000 annually to run
a Center after the initial one-time cost of Tk.1000 for
the blackboards and pocket board. Normally people from the
village are able to raise the fund by various means.
- The role of the teacher: It may be recalled that one of
the specific objectives of the research was to assess the
efficacy/advisability of employing a girl/woman from the
village itself, with some basic education and no formal
teacher's training, to be a teacher at the ECEC. The reason
for this was the cost and sustainability factor. The argument
was that a trained teacher would be more expensive and less
likely to remain at a Center much long. The experience at
the Centers has shown that such a woman/girl can indeed
do the job without much difficulty. Being a person from
the village she is known to the children, either directly
or indirectly, which is a big plus factor. As for education
background of the teacher, it has been found that a person
with high school education would suffice. If some one with
higher education is found who fulfills the other requirements
as mentioned in this note, so much the better. What has
emerged to be particularly important is the requirement
that the teacher must possess a loving personality, a willingness
to spend four hours a day with 26 children for 6 days a
week and to learn the art of teaching through on-the-job
training, In choosing a teacher it is important to remember
that "teaching" in an ECEC is a multidimensional
activity which requires a teacher to be a researcher all
the time. The teacher will have to constantly ask the question:
"what do I wish to accomplish on a given day and how
do I achieve this?"
- Teacher's Guide/Manual: The need for a teacher's guide
was also generally recognized. It has been felt that since
the ECEC approach is new and innovative, the teacher must
be provided with basic reading materials on how children
develop and learn in order to meet their cognitive, social,
emotional and physical needs; on the philosophy of early
childhood education, on curriculum to be followed and on
methodology of conducting the activities of the Center.
RIB hopes to prepare a teacher's guide/manual based on the
experience so far. Provisions will also have to be made
for visits by new teachers to an existing ECEC to observe
and learn from the teaching methods being used.
Curriculum of Activities at the ECEC:
4. As stated earlier, since a basic objective of the ECEC
is to pave the way for a comprehensive education of the child,
the curriculum to be followed at the Centers must reflect
this objective. The curriculum includes indoor and outdoor
games, including PT, which helps physical fitness of the children
and keeps them happily preoccupied for at least an hour of
a four-hour day. The remaining time is divided between using
the blackboards and the pocket board, learning nursery rhymes
and children's poems, counting and basic arithmetic, story
telling, clay modeling, gardening, sweeping the floors to
keep it clean, eating and resting etc. A local potter who
volunteered his services made the clay-modeling course possible
in Kajoli. A description here on how some of these activities
are performed will be pertinent.
- The games include playing outside whenever weather permits,
and as many indoors games (like zig-saw puzzles, blocks
made of wood or paper, Lego blocks and the like) as may
be obtained. The idea of providing instruments normally
used by kindergartens/play centers was abandoned because
of the high cost involved. Instead indigenous varieties
are innovated. It is not difficult however to collect games
from members of the local community. At Kajoli, a local
donor has provided the facilities for the outdoors games
(slide, swing, sea-saw etc.) and others have provided enough
indoors games to keep the children happily preoccupied during
game time. As mentioned earlier, at Kajoli a local potter
also provided clay pottery lessons once a week. The PT is
done both indoors and outdoors as weather permits. Everyday
the child whose mother cooks for the day plays the role
of the PT master. This system has worked very well and has
generated confidence and leadership among the children.
- The blackboards are normally prepared, wherever possible,
by colouring the cement plastering on the walls of three
sides of the classroom with black paint. If cemented walls
are not available they may be made from hard boards, painted
black and attached to the walls, whatever they may be made
of. There should be enough space on the blackboards so that
each child is allotted her/his own space on them. In the
beginning they draw on them freely without any guidance.
This is fun for them. When they become used to handling
the chalk, they learn to make forms and even to write, as
and when they are ready. It is amazing how quickly they
become adept in using the blackboard.
- The pocket boards provide a very innovative alternative
to books. They are made of a 4 ft by 3ft piece of long-cloth
stitched in such a way that a number of pockets are created,
4in by 4in, in several rows. These pockets are then filled
with cards made of Manila paper with alphabets, letters,
pictures, numbers etc. drawn on them. Normally the children
begin to use the pocket board from day one. In the beginning,
the pockets contain some ten cards with ten two-letter words
inscribed on them with pictures representing the words.
For example, aam (mango), boi (book), moi (ladder), ghor
(room/house), bol (ball) etc. The children are asked, for
example, to bring the card with aam, which they recognize
easily because of the picture of aam inscribed on it. This
becomes an easy and interesting game for the children to
play. They jostle with each other to find the right card.
By day two or three they are able to recognize the word
aam without the picture of mango. And so on and so forth.
It's amazing how quickly they learn the characters without
knowing their names. They are even able to form the word
aam, for example, by picking up the right alphabets from
the pocket board. Their vocabulary grows with the increase
in the number of words they are able to learn in this manner.
Once they have seen almost all the alphabets used in different
words, the process of learning the names of the alphabets
begin, usually through a nursery rhyme. The same applies
to learning the numbers. As they learn to read them, they
also begin to write them on the blackboard. Thus during
the year they learn to read, write and count almost all
that is required of children of class one of the government
primary school.
- The nursery rhymes (chharas) are chosen carefully so that
they may be sung as well, at least most of them. There are
many cassettes available in the market containing these
songs. The teacher has to learn them first as well as possible,
which she does very happily since it endears her to the
children enormously. Alternatively, a cassette player may
do the job. But there will a cost for this, unless someone
presents it to the Center. The poems too are chosen very
carefully to ensure that they contain images and descriptions
of village life to which the children can relate easily.
It is fascinating to see these small children quoting from
Tagore when they see something described by him in his poems,
such as a river scene or ducks frolicking in a village pond.
At the end of the calendar year, most of the children are
able to sing or recite over fifty chharas or poems, including
all those contained in the first year reader of the primary
school. Those who have seen the children in the beginning
of the year are amazed at how those who couldn't even speak
properly in the beginning are able to recite or sing with
so much of confidence.
- The story telling by the children is always a hilarious
affair. It has been noted among the children at most of
the Centers that they enjoy listening to and telling stories,
particularly of the type they can relate to very easily.
It helps them to articulate, stretch their imagination and
is a source of great enjoyment for their parents. A common
refrain of all the parents is how much they enjoy the prating
of their children after they return home from the Center,
their story telling, singsongs, recitations etc.
- Apart from the above activities, the children at the ECECs
are also engaged in various other activities varying from
place to place, such as singing, sweeping the floors before
class and after the meals, gardening and watering plants,
keeping the premises clean etc. Visits by village magicians,
teachers from other schools, education experts and others
to the Centers also add to children's learning process and
exposure to the outside world. They learn to exchange both
Hindu and Muslim greetings with the visitors thus exposing
them to communal variety. Most of the Centers have both
Hindu and Muslim students. Some also have Buddhists and
Christians, such as those in the Hill Tracts.
Some Additional Points:
5. There are a number of other issues that emerged in the
process of research at the various places. Some of these are
mentioned below:
- The question of uniform/attire arose at all the places.
It was felt in this regard that because of the economic
background of the parents and the unlikelihood of raising
enough fund from the local community to buy uniforms, it
is better to let the children come to the Center wearing
whatever their families may afford. In some of the Centers
the children come bare bodied, with only their shorts on.
In some places, however, the village community has provided
winter clothing.
- Another question that often arises when new Centers are
being set up relates to seating arrangement for the children.
Experience shows that this is best left alone to the Centers.
If children-size chairs/ tables/benches are available free
of cost or are made available by someone, the Centers will
have to decide whether to accept them But keeping the cost
factor in mind, most Centers have opted for seating on the
floor. A good practice here is to ask the parents to weave
the mats from coconut/date-palm/Palmyra fronds. This enhances
the sense of ownership of the parents about the Center.
A more important reason for floor-seating arrangement, however,
is the fact that by doing this the whole floor space remains
available for other needs, like children playing indoors,
doing their PT indoors, eating and resting/lying on the
floor etc. It is also easier for the children to clean the
room before/after class hours.
- The gender issue is equally important. Equal representation
of boys and girls in the class appears to be the best approach.
- It has also been recognized that arrangements must be
made to take the children for outings within the village
to get acquainted with the village itself, particularly
its trees, flowers and fauna. This will be attended to in
the future.
- To promote communal understanding/harmony/tolerance, efforts
must be made to bring in children from all the communities
in the village together in the Center, wherever possible.
This has proven to be extremely useful in Kajoli, where
efforts towards ensuring proportionate representation of
Hindu and Muslim children in the class have contributed
to children learning quickly about each other's mode of
salutation (salam/nomoskar), religious festivities etc.
It may be said to have sown the seeds of communal understanding
and tolerance.
- There is a need at the end of a year's stay at the Center
to ensure that the children are admitted to the local primary
school. The local "champion" or others may help
in this regard. This follow up is essential. In the Kajoli
experiment this has been ensured with some difficulty because
some of the children from the first year course appeared
to be under age for entry into class one of the primary
school where the age of entry is fixed at 6. In the end,
all the children were accommodated except two, one of whom
was indeed too small and taken back to the Center for another
year's stay and the other was admitted to the local Madrasah
(religious school), as wished by the parent. It has also
been ensured that all the children who were eligible were
provided with the government scholarship of Tk.100 each
per month. These children are clearly proving to be the
best in the class since they had almost completed the requirements
of their class during their stay at the Center. It is interesting
to note however that they are ever eager to come back to
the Center whenever they get an opportunity. There is a
need to follow up the development of these children over
the years. RIB expects to make it a part of its follow-up
research on this subject.
Future Plans:
6. RIB has supported the research on the ECEC project with
a view to developing a replicable model in this regard. The
research work is continuing at 14 places presently including
in Kajoli. The other places are Piruli village in Narail District,
Kamarpukur and Boropukur villages in Nilphamari, Ramu and
Naikonchori in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Chitolmari in Bagerhat,
Moheswarchanda in Jhinedah, Geragonj in Magura and five villages
in Chapainowabgonj. In many of these places RIB has provided
the start up money with the expectation that eventually they
would be on their own. Some of this has already happened.
In other places RIB has had no involvement at all. They are
running on their own, which is very encouraging. RIB has the
following ideas in mind for the future:
- RIB will review the situation at the end of the second
year of research, which will be the end of December 2004.
- RIB will continue to provide technical support to new
Centers that may emerge in the future with people's initiative.
This will include knowledge sharing, curriculum support,
teacher's manual and teachers training by arranging visits
of prospective "champions" and teachers to existing
Centers.
- RIB plans to hold periodic workshops, mutual visits of
teachers, "champions"/would be "champions"
of such schools for exchange of experiences and mutual stimulation.
- RIB plans to maintain a dedicated staff at its secretariat
to help the propagation of ECECs in the country.
- If there are individuals who wish to support ECECs in
their respective villages, RIB secretariat will offer advice/support
as mentioned above.
- Once RIB considers that the model has been sufficiently
tested and that its findings may be shared with all concerned
with education, arrangements will be made for its proper
dissemination.
- RIB looks forward to comments and suggestions from all
concerned for further improvement and propagation of the
model.
- RIB welcomes expression of interest from the public to
watch its video programme of the ECEC project and to arrange
for visit to an existing ECEC.
go to top
|